License the proposed change often in the form of a pull request is licensed under the same terms as the project itself e. To understand the difference between gpl and lgpl you have to understand the basic idea of open source software. For those who must work with staticallylinked implementations of multiple software standards, the gpl is often a poor license, because it precludes using proprietary implementations of the standards. Gplcompatible software is software whose conditions of propagation, modification and use would permit combination with gcc in accord with the license of gcc. Oss watch provides unbiased advice and guidance on the use, development, and licensing of free software, open source software, and open source hardware. Software licensed with any gnu license can be used and modified everywhere, without any restrictions in private and even in corporate environments. Gpl advantages and disadvantages a common reason to use the gpl is when modifying or extending the gcc compiler. The fsfs original plan of having the entire gpl v3 composed and agreed upon in twelve months was always extremely ambitious. Jul 24, 2018 in the absence of distribution, a user is merely using the software, and since the act of running the gpl code is not subject to the license, one does not have to share their modifications to the code. If i use gpl software in my application, but dont modify or distribute it, do i have to release my application.
Its a widely held belief that you cant mix gpl code and code covered by other open source licenses. They can also sell or give away copies of the program with or without any changes they made to it. Can i use gpl software in a commercial application software. I have a concern of using gpl v2 and gpl v3 licensed software in commercial production environment. The gnu general public license permits making a modified version and letting the public access it on a server without ever releasing its source code to the public. I would like to use haproxy as a load balancing solution. At the end youll find some key differences with gpl v2. Any user of free software can also change the software and share it with friends and colleagues. Richard stallman created the gpl to protect the gnu software from being made proprietary. Gpls main purpose is to promote the free availability and use of software for any purpose and for any users needs. M also distributes the gpl d software commercially, so m too must comply with the gpl and provide source or m s own offer for source to m s customers. Since you have access to the codes through open source software, you are permitted to make changes, improve it, and create your own twist to it. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu project.
The fsf argues that freedomrespecting free software should also not restrict commercial use and distribution. How to license your program under version 3 of the gpl. What am i not allowed to do with code that is released under the gpl v3. Odence has noted that software with no identifiable license attached with it a side effect of the rise of github is also a. This is particularly apt when working with oneoff specialty cpus in environments where all software costs are likely to be considered overhead, with minimal expectations that others will use the resulting compiler. For gpl programs running on your server, you are the user, for agpl, the real users of the app are. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint. This is in contrast to permissive licenses like bsd, which impose minimal restrictions on the redistribution of covered software. In accordance with the software freedom law centers sflcs philosophy of assisting the community with gpl compliance cooperatively, this guide focuses on avoiding compliance actions and minimizing the negative impact when enforcement. Loosely speaking, the gpl requires that you offer to make the source code available to whoever you make the binary available to. The free software foundation today released the second discussion draft of the gnu affero general public license gnu agpl. V provides the software to m, along with a compliant offer for source. Everything a government attorney needs to know about open.
Jun 21, 2016 this is a guest post from exygys long time counsel joseph morris. The gnu general public license is a free, copyleft open source license for software and other kinds of works. The problem is that nowadays, distribution of software. The library refers to a covered work governed by this license, other than an application or a combined work as defined below. Gplv3 and software as a service by brett smith contributions published on mar 29, 2007 09. Incidentally, the gplv2 is written to be read by nonlawyers.
Using gpl 3rd party code for internal closed source project closed ask question. Gnu general public license simple english wikipedia, the. Licensing under gplv3 ensures the highest amount of availability in the open source community. Other than that, the license is virtually the same as gpl v3. Among other things, were often asking joe about software licensing issues. Wikipedias content is mostly under the creative commons bysa license, which has similar sharealike features to the gpl. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it.
Describes the rights to practice patent claims of contributors. Difference between gplv2 and gplv3 difference between. With traditional gpl, copyleft was associated with the concept of distribution of software. There was a misconception in the early days of open source that, if you build it, they will come.
How to license your free software with gnu gpl v3 youtube. This license has been deprecated since license list version 2. Let me know, please, what shall i do to get jtdx licensed in the compatible to gpl v3 manner. Can i use the gplv3 license for my commercial application. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. This seems to fall under installation information according to the gpl v3 license.
The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. See the respective gnu general public license for more details. Firstly, gpl v2 software had started to be distributed in encrypted forms, perhaps as the operating software of a hardware device. It is the most important and widespread open source license where approximately 60 per cent of open source software use this license like linux and busybox. On the other hand, using the gpl is better than no license at all. While the gpl is an open source license, it is fundamentally a free software license.
The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. Describes the ability to place warranty on the software licensed. Gplv3 and software as a service free software foundation. If youre just using a distributed multinode system inside your company, then youre entirely in the clear, as yan says.
As used herein, this license refers to version 3 of the gnu lesser general public license, and the gnu gpl refers to version 3 of the gnu general public license. Distributing in this sense means giving or selling to customers. The licenses are incompatible in one direction only, and it is a result of asfs licensing. Gpl requires any other project or source that is using the project under gpl to also be licensed as gpl. The emacs general public license, a february 1988 version, a direct predecessor of the gnu gpl. Source code must be made available when the software is distributed. In this situation, m cannot simply pass v s offer for source along to its customers. Aug 26, 2008 this is a guide to effective compliance with the gnu general public license gpl and related licenses. A practical guide to gpl compliance covers gplv2 and v3 from the software freedom law center. One of its founding principles was to release qt as free software to the open source community. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. You may discover, however that these terms do not work so well in your favor, since one of the terms prevents you from a. If this is what you want to do, use the gnu lesser general public license instead of this license.
I am always open for communication and there are my answers to the raised questions. If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms. May 05, 2009 this free software foundation license is fairly new, and thus we wanted to talk about how this license differs from gpl. If you want to find out more about any of these topics, were the people to ask. The gpl the gnu general public license the most popular copyleft licence, sometimes gets a hostile press, often for reasons that. You can elect to use the gpl v3 license without paying a fee, provided you comply with gplv3 license terms. The gnu general public license gpl is a computer software copyleft license. Short for general public license, the license that accompanies some open source software that details how the software and its accompany source code can be freely copied, distributed and modified.
If you intend to use the gpld software strictly within the company, you can make. Dont believe the hype, agpl open source licensing is. The free software foundation fsf hopes to release the final draft of the gnu general public license version 3 gpl v3 by jan. Can gpl licenced software be used in corporate environments. Gnu general public license this license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. Why gpl still gives enterprises the jitters infoworld. Some of the mostinstalled open source software is gpllicensed, such as linux, wordpress, and wikipedias underlying software, mediawiki. The gnu affero gpl version 3 has also been brought into the fold. We, the free software foundation, use the gnu general public license for most of our software. Jun 20, 2012 you can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license. Gpl is the acronym for gnu s general public license, and its one of the most popular open source licenses. Gpl software can also be modified without restrictions, as long as the modified software is kept private. Gpl v3 main features the resulting licence, the gpl v3, is broadly similar in effect to gpl v2. The gpl family of licenses is unique among open source licenses in how past, current, and future versions of the license may apply to the software program.
As a producer of software licensed as gpl v3, you cannot be hold liable for damages that occur while using your software. Mar 05, 2012 this is a tutorial on how to license your free software with gnu glp v3 licence. Using gpl 3rd party code for internal closed source project. Gnu general public license v3 gpl3 explained in plain english. You asked two questions, and they both have simple answers. You can support our efforts by making a donation to the fsf. You may take specific aspects of the ux, general concepts etc and use it in your app provided its not overtly based solely on work from the gpl licensed software. Gpl is basically the legal terminology that makes open source software what it is. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. Our goal with using agpl is to preserve the concept of copyleft with mongodb. Differences between gpl and lgpl when using licensed software.
A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. The gpl thus minimizes the number of programs that can be built using a gpled standard. If you create software that uses gpl, you must license that software under gpl v3 see gpl faq, and. The original affero gpl was designed to ensure that all users of a web application would be able to receive its source. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make sure it remains free software for all its users. The gpl is a copyleft software licence 1 published by the usbased free software foundation. In fact, the fsf maintainers of the gpl have harsh words for licenses that try to restrict use of the software in any way.
It keeps your code bona fide open source, so people who want to use and extend it noncommercially can do so without worrying about you at all. What agpl does on top of gpl is the redefinition of user. It has a clause called copyleft which compels any user who creates and distributes modified versions to have the revisions subject to gpl and disclose the source of the modified version. Jun 29, 2007 the gnu general public license does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. Agpl fixes this loophole in gpl by saying that if you use the software over a network, you are bound by the copyleft. By not fully understanding this unique license feature, open source software developers may inadvertently create ambiguity. Can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. This page is maintained by the free software foundations licensing and compliance lab. You cant mix gpl software with other software zdnet. Braden cox of the association for competitive technology act, a lobbying organization that promotes an agenda friendly to the proprietary software industry, sees the gpl v3 effort as openly.
Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software. The main author of both licenses is richard stallman. The gpl is a copyleft software licence1 published by the usbased free software foundation. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. If the application is only for internal use, then this is probably not a problem, since you are presumably not worried about your internal users requesting or using the source.
You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changesdates of in source files and keep modifications under gpl. Use decompression software such as winzip or winrar to extract the file you download before the upgrade. The linux kernel is licensed under the gnu general public license, version 2. Gpl licensed code cant be used for paid and proprietary software. Difference between gpl and lgpl difference between. The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. In return, you are asked to ensure that any users of software that you have built using gpl software receive the same freedom to modify your software in turn. Yes, the gpl is completely compatible with the notion.
We recently had a discussion about whether to recommend mit, apache, or gpl to one of our nonprofit clients for their open source project. This license is based on gplv3 with a new requirement to ensure that users who interact with the software over a network can receive the source for that program. Difference between different types of open sources licenses. The intricacies of using the gpl license have been hashed out repeatedly in many other forums. Here are some highlights of a few specific issues that come up occasionaly.
The respective programs are distributed without any warranty. This part looks at mixing gpl v3 and v2 software with software. Also if you make changes to the software and it is licensed using affero license eg. Free software foundation hopes to release final gpl v3 by jan. The gpl licenses clarify how license versions are to be applied to the program with a clause in their. Version 3 of the gpl specifically addresses things like web services. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license. Pages in category software using the gpl license the following 150 pages are in this category, out of 150 total. If you use a gpl library in your project, that creates a derivative work of the library, and your entire project has to be licensed under the gpl. The following 150 pages are in this category, out of 150. This license lets the user of the software use a program in many of the same ways as if it were public domain. Does using the gpl for a program make it gnu software. The gnu general public license v3 gpl v3 for short is the next version of the extremely popular free and open source licence the gpl v2. In the early versions, this was limited to unixlinux and the x11 windowing system.
Jun 29, 2007 the licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source code becomes available to the community. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may wish to relicense your software under gpl version 3. If i use gpl software in my internalclosed source app do i have to make the source publicly available. It updates its predecessor to reflect the changes that have taken place in the it world over the sixteen years that separate them. The most widespread use of gpl is in reference to the gnu gpl, which is commonly abbreviated simply as gpl when it is understood that the term refers. However, gplv3 software cannot be included in apache projects. The gpl wont infect your proprietary software unless you link to it. As a free software license, much of the stewardship and support for the gpl has been driven by the free software foundation. Dont believe the hype, agpl open source licensing is toxic and unpopular by matt asay matt asay is a veteran technology columnist who has written for cnet, readwrite, and other. Gpl is copyleft, meaning you have to distrubute any derivative works of the original also under the gpl. Mar 29, 2007 gplv3 and software as a service by brett smith contributions published on mar 29, 2007 09. Does all gnu software use the gnu gpl as its license.
1368 788 1297 1422 1515 529 1066 1439 431 547 1474 1039 1042 1494 1487 279 1129 1468 273 823 852 1433 1595 393 1303 1443 309 838 1442 463 996 554 1363 1200 706